Yesterday we designed the perfect day. The 12-month vision. What you're doing, who you're doing it with, how the hours break down. If you missed it, start with Part 1.
Now that you have your AI coach set up and your ONE Thing mapped out for the year, you have a general flight plan. Think of it like a pilot flying from London to LA. You've got your route, your altitude, your heading. But imagine if that pilot was off by half a degree at any point during that journey. He wouldn't end up in LA. He might end up in San Francisco. Or worse, Anchorage.
That's what the daily check-in is for.
Start With the Habit
I'm big into habits. One of the habits I started years ago was a daily journal. There's a brilliant book by Hal Elrod called The Miracle Morning. The core concept is simple: wake up earlier than you need to and run through what Elrod calls SAVERS โ Silence, Affirmations, Visualization, Exercise, Reading, and Scribing (journaling). You can do the whole thing in 6 minutes or stretch it to an hour. Over 3 million copies sold in 37 languages, and I get why. I started The Miracle Morning with a 30-day challenge and I did complete it. The one thing that really stuck was the journaling. Years later, that daily writing habit became the foundation for something much more powerful.
What the Morning Check-In Looks Like
So your day might start like this.
Open your AI coach. For me, I use Claude with all my project files connected, and I've written a markdown file that it reads before each session. That file contains my 12-month vision, my current phase, my scoring criteria, and my rules. The AI doesn't guess what matters to me. I told it.
All I need to do now is type "one thing" to start my day, and it walks me through the framework from The ONE Thing: What is the ONE Thing I can do such that by doing it everything else will be easier or unnecessary?
Then I tell it the plan for the day. It walks me through the parts that look promising and the parts I don't need to focus on. It reads yesterday's log. It knows what I did and what I didn't do. And it only brings up the gaps.
The Builder Trap
Here's a live example. I am a builder. I want to build things. Cool automations, slick website features, dashboards, integrations. But my ONE Thing right now is revenue. What does it matter if I built some clever widget for my website? Did that bring in revenue? No.
So the coach and I are in sync. This week is all about prospecting and getting revenue in the door. That means I should be spending most of my time on outreach, and probably will be for a while, until some other problem comes up โ like suddenly I'm swamped and I need to hire someone to help with delivery.
That's the cascading focus in action. The yearly ONE Thing (revenue) narrows into a monthly focus (prospecting), which narrows into a weekly target, which narrows into today.
From Weekly to Daily
From my weekly plan, the coach and I get specific about today. Not "do some prospecting." Specific. Something like: record 10 custom Loom videos for the best candidates the coach finds for me based on buy signals. It goes through Apollo, identifies the right prospects, and then I record a personalised intro for each one. Those go into a 5 or 6 email sequence and get sent out. All AI-automated except the part that matters most โ me, talking directly to a real person.
Then, because my coach knows I'm committed to the Build in Public writing, I do some writing. And at the end of the day, I always save an hour or two for soul work โ the Finn Wardman World Explorer Fund. Foundation work. I love that my coach gives this equal weight to the revenue work. It's not optional. It's scored.
The Decision Filter
Every decision or opportunity that comes in gets run through a four-part grading criteria:
1. Client fit โ Is this a youth nonprofit or adjacent? Does the mission resonate? 2. Revenue fit โ Does this move toward my current phase target? 3. Delivery fit โ Can I (or my team) deliver without breaking the model? 4. Rhythm fit โ Will this break my morning/break/afternoon pattern?
Score each one 1โ5. Five is do it. Four is probably yes, but name the tradeoff. Three is caution. Two or below, walk away.
Here's a real example. A friend of mine sent me a really great cascading waterfall content strategy for my Build in Public series. It was impressive. Detailed. Would have been fun to implement. I ran it through the coach, and it came back with: This looks great, but this isn't in our plan. Put it on ice until we need it.
That's the half-degree correction.
A side wind was hitting the nose of the plane. I started to drift off the flight plan. The coach course-corrected me before I spent a day building something that wasn't going to move the needle.
Not a Cheerleader
It's really important that the coach is not a ra-ra cheerleader. You don't need that. You need something that sticks exactly to the plan and tells you what is a good idea based on your ONE Thing and when you should or should not be working on something. If I spent zero time on the foundation yesterday, it flags it. If prospecting was strong, it stays quiet. The silence is the approval.
I'm finding this type of daily workflow one of the most important things I do in my day, and it probably only takes me 10 to 15 minutes.
Tomorrow: The Receipts
Tomorrow we'll go over the last part โ the actual. What did you do today? Last week? Last month? This is the part that maybe most people won't love, because you see it in black and white. Wait a second โ I'm not on track to LA anymore. I seem to be headed to Winnipeg. Let's course correct and start flying south.
That's Part 3. The daily logs. The proof.
Ciao ciao baby.
Revenue: $0 | Clients: 0 | Prospects: 5
Day 9 of 365.
This is Part 2 of the AI Co-Pilot Series. Part 1 here. Part 3 drops tomorrow.